Open evidence · Edition 1.0.1

Edikka’s library of instruments

Instruments made to be examined, reused and cited. Protocols, audit grids, registers and datasets are published with their source, version and limits.

Browse the 21 instruments Download the complete edition
Instruments
21

Documented instruments to observe, audit, decide and automate under human control.

Explore the catalogue
Catalogued files
82

Grids, protocols, registers and datasets collected in a versioned archive.

Download the archive
DOI deposits
4

Four deposits associated with three of the 21 instruments, including the MIA-FR protocol and its J0 results.

Explore source studies
Open licence
CC BY 4.0

Reusable resources with attribution to Edikka, the source and the version used.

Read the licence

Complete catalogue

Choose the evidence before the format.

Start from the decision to be supported. Every source page explains the context; downloadable files come second.

01

Observe

Studies, baselines and protocols that document a state without turning a snapshot into a universal claim.

Public-evidence study Reference instrument

French GEO public-evidence observatory · wave 1

Thirty GEO-provider websites observed through 18 checks and 300 editorial decisions, published only as anonymised aggregates.

Distinguish public evidence from a commercial claim.

Version
1.0.2
Status
Published · anonymised aggregates
Published
Languages
FR · EN
Read the HTML source — French GEO public-evidence observatory · wave 1
Preview & files 3 files

Inside the instrument

Three excerpts from the published file · abridged where necessary
CheckObservedInconclusive
Pages lisibles246
Offre indexable246
Canonical cohérente236

Read the original file — French GEO public-evidence observatory · wave 1 · v1.0.2 · original excerpt in French

Dated observations from this edition; these are not a new assessment of the current sites.

Cite this version

Edikka (2026). French GEO public-evidence observatory · wave 1 (v1.0.2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21943813. Accessed 2026-09-11. CC BY 4.0.

Version history: this catalogue documents the version shown above. No earlier change log is provided here.

Interpretation limit

A deterministic, non-random, single-wave panel; no agency ranking or individual result.

Public-observation dataset

French web-accessibility observatory · pilot wave 01

A dated record of public statements and signals across twelve major French-city websites, including observed sources.

Read an accessibility statement within its dated scope.

Version
1.0
Status
Published · pilot wave
Published
Languages
FR
Read the HTML source (FR) — French web-accessibility observatory · pilot wave 01
Preview & files 2 files

Inside the instrument

Three excerpts from the published file · abridged where necessary
SitePublished stateDeclared rate
ParisPartiellement conforme53,52 % critères RGAA
MarseilleNon détectéNone
LyonPartiellement conforme81,03 %

Read the original file — French web-accessibility observatory · pilot wave 01 · v1.0 · original excerpt in French

Dated observations from this edition; these are not a new assessment of the current sites.

Cite this version

Edikka (2026). French web-accessibility observatory · pilot wave 01 (v1.0). https://www.edikka.com/insights/observatoire-accessibilite#library-source-accessibility-observatory-wave-01. Accessed 2026-09-11. CC BY 4.0.

Version history: this catalogue documents the version shown above. No earlier change log is provided here.

Interpretation limit

Observation of public declarative signals: this dataset is neither an RGAA audit nor an exhaustive conformance assessment.

Multi-engine baseline

France SEO/GEO baseline · 27 August 2026

Twenty queries replayed in Google France, Google AI Mode and Perplexity to freeze an initial state of rankings and citations.

Choose a stable query set before comparing SEO/GEO observations.

Version
1.0.0
Status
Published · frozen baseline
Published
Languages
FR
Read the HTML source — France SEO/GEO baseline · 27 August 2026
Preview & files 5 files

Inside the instrument

Three excerpts from the published file · abridged where necessary
IDCorpus queryIntent
Q01qu'est-ce que le GEOdefinition
Q02GEO définition marketingdefinition
Q03Generative Engine Optimizationdefinition

Read the original file — France SEO/GEO baseline · 27 August 2026 · v1.0.0 · original excerpt in French

Cite this version

Edikka (2026). France SEO/GEO baseline · 27 August 2026 (v1.0.0). https://www.edikka.com/en/insights/seo/what-is-geo#library-source-seo-geo-france-baseline-2026-08-27. Accessed 2026-09-11. CC BY 4.0.

Version history: this catalogue documents the version shown above. No earlier change log is provided here.

Interpretation limit

One pass per environment: neither probabilistic frequency nor future stability can be inferred.

Bilingual claim register

Edikka GEO Claim Register

Thirty-nine GEO claims linked to sources, evidence levels, limitations and maintenance status in French and English.

Check which sources support a GEO claim.

Version
1.1.1
Status
Published · maintained
Published
Languages
FR · EN
Read the HTML source — Edikka GEO Claim Register
Preview & files 5 files

Inside the instrument

Three excerpts from the published file · abridged where necessary
IDClaimStatus
GEO-001The framework named Generative Engine Optimization was introduced by Aggarwal et al. in a November 2023 preprint and later published at KDD 2024.Supported
GEO-002The founding study reports visibility gains of up to 40% in its experimental environment.Supported
GEO-003The founding study’s gains concern content already present in a fixed context; they do not demonstrate its organic discovery.Supported

Read the original file — Edikka GEO Claim Register · v1.1.1

Cite this version

Edikka (2026). Edikka GEO Claim Register (v1.1.1). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22128746. Accessed 2026-09-11. CC BY 4.0.

Version history: this catalogue documents the version shown above. No earlier change log is provided here.

Interpretation limit

The register qualifies documentary claims; it guarantees neither rankings, citations nor commercial outcomes.

AI-visibility measurement protocol

MIA-FR protocol

A workbook, an initial 25-prompt corpus and an observation schema separating citations, sources, mentions, impressions and post-exposure value.

Define prompts and conditions before measuring AI visibility.

Version
1.0
Status
Published · protocol and results archived
Published
Languages
FR · EN
Read the HTML source — MIA-FR protocol

External record · no endorsement

This record covers the protocol only, not the J0 results. Listing derived from Zenodo metadata; neither an evaluation nor an endorsement by NLM or NIH.

Preview & files 3 files

Inside the instrument

Three excerpts from the published file · abridged where necessary
IDCorpus promptIntent
P001Comment mesurer sa visibilité dans les réponses IA en France ?Informationnelle
P002Qu’est-ce que la visibilité IA d’une marque et comment la définir ?Informationnelle
P003Quelle différence entre visibilité IA, visibilité SEO et trafic organique ?Comparative

Read the original file — MIA-FR protocol · v1.0 · original excerpt in French

Cite this version

Edikka (2026). MIA-FR protocol (v1.0). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22106520. Accessed 2026-09-11. CC BY 4.0.

Version history: this catalogue documents the version shown above. No earlier change log is provided here.

Interpretation limit

Visibility varies by service, session, location and date; J0 results are not a forecast.

02

Audit

Grids and registers connecting every check to a method, evidence, status and limitation.

Put these grids to work on your site.

Get help using these grids Tell us about your context and the grids you would like to apply to your site. SEO expertise
44-check audit grid Reference instrument

Technical SEO audit grid

Forty-four checks across thirteen domains, with method, expected evidence, required access, severity, owner and decision.

Connect an SEO check to the evidence needed for a conclusion.

Version
1.1
Status
Published · bilingual
Published
Languages
FR · EN
Read the HTML source — Technical SEO audit grid
Preview & files 6 files

Inside the instrument

Three excerpts from the published file · abridged where necessary
IDCheckExpected evidence
TS01The final page returns an actionable HTTP status code.Tested URL, timestamp and final 200 status for a public canonical page.
TS02Redirects are intentional, direct and loop-free.One final destination, documented chain and no loop.
TS03Server errors and soft 404s do not replace an explicit response.Consistent 4xx/5xx responses and an error template that does not return 200 by default.

Read the original file — Technical SEO audit grid · v1.1

Cite this version

Edikka (2026). Technical SEO audit grid (v1.1). https://www.edikka.com/en/insights/web-development/technical-seo-foundations#library-source-technical-seo-audit-grid. Accessed 2026-09-11. CC BY 4.0.

Version history: this catalogue documents the version shown above. No earlier change log is provided here.

Interpretation limit

A public observation proves neither Search Console, logs nor configuration; the grid makes no ranking promise.

Measurement and counter-test protocol

Core Web Vitals protocol

An LCP, INP and CLS protocol separating field data, first-party RUM, lab runs and traces, with a local collector.

Qualify the source and population before interpreting Web Vitals.

Version
1.2
Status
Published · quarterly review
Published
Languages
FR · EN
Read the HTML source — Core Web Vitals protocol
Preview & files 4 files

Inside the instrument

Three excerpts from the published file · abridged where necessary
MetricUnitGood threshold
LCPms2500
INPms200
CLSscore0.1

Read the original file — Core Web Vitals protocol · v1.2

Cite this version

Edikka (2026). Core Web Vitals protocol (v1.2). https://www.edikka.com/en/insights/web-development/core-web-vitals-guide#library-source-core-web-vitals-protocol. Accessed 2026-09-11. CC BY 4.0.

Version history: this catalogue documents the version shown above. No earlier change log is provided here.

Interpretation limit

A lab run does not establish population experience; public field data remains distinct from local evidence.

Audit grid and evidence collector

Web image audit grid

Thirty-six checks across weight, responsive selection, quality, LCP, CLS, accessibility, image SEO, caching and CI.

Document which images need correction and the supporting evidence.

Version
1.1
Status
Published · replayable collector
Published
Languages
FR · EN
Read the HTML source — Web image audit grid
Preview & files 6 files

Inside the instrument

Three excerpts from the published file · abridged where necessary
IDCheckExpected evidence
IMG01Is every visible image inventoried with its final URL, template and role?Dated inventory with page URL, currentSrc, role and owner.
IMG02Is each image classified as LCP, content, decoration, interface, social or data?Reviewed role and short rationale for each priority image.
IMG03Do critical images have an owner and a review date?Owner, last review and next review date.

Read the original file — Web image audit grid · v1.1

Cite this version

Edikka (2026). Web image audit grid (v1.1). https://www.edikka.com/en/insights/web-development/web-image-optimisation#library-source-web-image-audit-grid. Accessed 2026-09-11. CC BY 4.0.

Version history: this catalogue documents the version shown above. No earlier change log is provided here.

Interpretation limit

The grid separates browser facts from decisions; the historical v1.0 replay does not validate the corrected IMG07 check in v1.1.

Bilingual 36-check foundation

Professional website accessibility foundation

Thirty-six checks in eight families, with statuses, severities, decisions, expected evidence and a dated public self-assessment.

Prepare a journey assessment and identify checks needing further review.

Version
1.1
Status
Public candidate
Published
Languages
FR · EN
Read the HTML source — Professional website accessibility foundation
Preview & files 5 files

Inside the instrument

Three excerpts from the published file · abridged where necessary
IDCheckExpected evidence
A11Y01Identifiable page titleBrowser-tab screenshot and head extract.
A11Y02Declared primary languageDOM extract and test log.
A11Y03Coherent heading hierarchyExported heading outline.

Read the original file — Professional website accessibility foundation · v1.1

Cite this version

Edikka (2026). Professional website accessibility foundation (v1.1). https://www.edikka.com/en/insights/web-development/web-accessibility-professional-website-basics#library-source-professional-website-accessibility-foundation. Accessed 2026-09-11. CC BY 4.0.

Version history: this catalogue documents the version shown above. No earlier change log is provided here.

Interpretation limit

A public candidate for journey diagnosis; the distributed workbook remains edition 1.0 and the package is neither a certification nor an RGAA conformance audit.

Eight-axis grid and validation protocol

Landing Page audit grid

Eight weighted axes, 0/1/2 criteria, expected evidence, validation schemas and a public self-audit of three journeys.

Prepare a landing page using explicit criteria and evidence.

Version
1.0
Status
Published · external validation pending
Published
Languages
FR · EN
Read the HTML source — Landing Page audit grid
Preview & files 7 files

Inside the instrument

Three excerpts from the published file · abridged where necessary
IDAreaExpected evidence
LP01Intent and message matchCampaign brief, query, ad, email, or documented segment.
LP02Promise and valueCold comprehension test and hero copy.
LP03Evidence and trustURL, dated capture, case, method, author, or scoped result.

Read the original file — Landing Page audit grid · v1.0

Cite this version

Edikka (2026). Landing Page audit grid (v1.0). https://www.edikka.com/en/insights/ux-ui-design/effective-landing-page#library-source-landing-page-audit-grid. Accessed 2026-09-11. CC BY 4.0.

Version history from the instrument
  • v1.0 · 2026-08-21 Publication des huit axes, poids, niveaux, preuves, formule et seuils.
  • v1.0.1 · 2026-08-21 Précision de la résolution et du protocole inter-évaluateurs ; poids et seuils inchangés.
  • v1.0.2 · 2026-08-21 Parité documentaire FR/EN, rattachement du résultat primaire à son DOI et métadonnées descriptives.
  • v1.0.3 · 2026-09-07 Noms canoniques, libellé 01 harmonisé et règle de fraîcheur des scores ; poids et seuils inchangés.

Interpretation limit

A preparation heuristic with no predictive power over conversion; external validation is preregistered but has no results yet.

Register of 18 audited findings

Digital audit decision register

Eighteen findings applied to edikka.com with evidence, controlled status, priority, dependency, owner and next counter-test.

Turn a documented finding into a decision, owner and follow-up check.

Version
1.0.1
Status
Published · verifiable register
Published
Languages
FR · EN
Read the HTML source — Digital audit decision register
Preview & files 6 files

Inside the instrument

Three excerpts from the published file · abridged where necessary
IDDated observationRecorded decision
ADA01Content animated by the reveal class was reported to have no fallback when JavaScript is absent.Finding withdrawn. Test rule requalified: check the property — is the content visible without JavaScript? — never the presence of one specific tag.
ADA02The scripting:none query does not cover the case where JavaScript is enabled but the script is interrupted before initialisation: a 404 on app.js, a runtime error, a blocking extension. No js-ready or no-js class…Invert the default: content visible by default, animation enabled by a js-ready class set after initialisation. Not done as of 5 September 2026.
ADA03The main heading was reported as invisible for about four seconds after load.Finding withdrawn. Any animation measurement is run in a foreground tab and confirmed visually.

Read the original file — Digital audit decision register · v1.0.1

Dated observations from this edition; these are not a new assessment of the current sites.

Cite this version

Edikka (2026). Digital audit decision register (v1.0.1). https://www.edikka.com/en/insights/digital-strategy/digital-audit-complete-method#library-source-digital-audit-decision-register. Accessed 2026-09-11. CC BY 4.0.

Version history from the instrument
  • v1.0.1 · 2026-09-07 Editorial-integrity correction: targets made bilingual, ADA03 evidence strength downgraded because no dated artifact is attached, CRAWL linked to ADA09 and crawl scope clarified for ADA13. States, severities, due dates and counts are unchanged.
  • v1.0 · 2026-09-05 Register frozen after counter-verification. Eighteen findings on edikka.com: nine established, five contradicted, two to test and two out of scope. The public crawl and pre-existing accessibility evidence invalidated two additional statements. No average score.

Interpretation limit

An Edikka-specific case with no aggregate score or generalisation to other organisations; unknowns remain “to test”.

Bilingual 16-check protocol

Edikka UX writing protocol

Sixteen before/after checks across three Edikka interfaces, covering labels, accessible names, errors and fidelity to evidence.

Check whether interface copy helps people understand and act.

Version
1.0.1
Status
Published · quarterly review
Published
Languages
FR · EN
Read the HTML source — Edikka UX writing protocol
Preview & files 2 files

Inside the instrument

Three excerpts from the published file · abridged where necessary
IDCheckAcceptance
UXW01The overall verdict only depends on scans that pass the published reliability threshold.An inconclusive result is excluded from the confirmed rank and cannot create or erase a lead or lag.
UXW02Every inconclusive result is named and counted.Readers know how many results are excluded and why without opening every scan detail.
UXW03The wording reproduces the actually confirmed gap.The point difference and its direction match the reliable subset.

Read the original file — Edikka UX writing protocol · v1.0.1

Cite this version

Edikka (2026). Edikka UX writing protocol (v1.0.1). https://www.edikka.com/en/insights/ux-ui-design/ux-writing-clearer-interfaces#library-source-ux-writing-protocol. Accessed 2026-09-11. CC BY 4.0.

Version history from the instrument
  • v1.0.1 · 2026-09-03 Corrected the per-interface result distribution in the public summary. The sixteen observations, nine corrected gaps and UXW06 to-test result remain unchanged.
  • v1.0 · 2026-09-03 Protocol frozen; three interfaces audited; nine gaps corrected; UXW06 kept to test.

Interpretation limit

An internal three-surface case; outstanding screen-reader tests are not reported as passed.

03

Decide

Matrices and templates for assigning ownership, framing a project and making GO/NO-GO decisions explicit.

Bilingual matrix of 24 decisions Reference instrument

UX/UI Responsibility Matrix

Twenty-four interface decisions classified as UX-led, UI-led, shared or evidence-required, with acceptance, owner and deliverable.

Assign an interface decision and identify the expected evidence.

Version
1.0
Status
Published · source matrix
Published
Languages
FR · EN
Read the HTML source — UX/UI Responsibility Matrix
Preview & files 2 files

Inside the instrument

Three excerpts from the published file · abridged where necessary
IDSituationLead
UXUI01Ordering steps in a complex formUX / interaction design
UXUI02Structuring navigation and information architectureUX / information architecture
UXUI03Designing recovery after interruptionUX / interaction design

Read the original file — UX/UI Responsibility Matrix · v1.0

Cite this version

Edikka (2026). UX/UI Responsibility Matrix (v1.0). https://www.edikka.com/en/insights/ux-ui-design/ux-vs-ui-differences#library-source-ux-ui-responsibility-matrix. Accessed 2026-09-11. CC BY 4.0.

Version history: this catalogue documents the version shown above. No earlier change log is provided here.

Interpretation limit

Assigning responsibility proves neither usability, preference nor business impact.

Bilingual decision application

Conversion application of the UX/UI matrix

Application of the 24 UX/UI decisions to abandonment, comprehension, trust and conversion hypotheses.

Separate a conversion hypothesis from an effect actually measured.

Version
1.0
Status
Published · based on UXUI01–24
Published
Languages
FR · EN
Read the HTML source — Conversion application of the UX/UI matrix
Preview & files 2 files

Inside the instrument

Three excerpts from the published file · abridged where necessary
IDContextRequired evidence
UXUI01Order the steps of an enquiry, sign-up or payment flow.Task testing for progression; funnel measurement or a controlled experiment for business effect.
UXUI02Connect intent, offer, evidence and action in the information architecture.Tree or findability testing for discovery; journey data for impact on enquiries.
UXUI03Let people resume an interrupted action without losing valid data.An interruption scenario for recovery; measured comparison for abandonment.

Read the original file — Conversion application of the UX/UI matrix · v1.0

Cite this version

Edikka (2026). Conversion application of the UX/UI matrix (v1.0). https://www.edikka.com/en/insights/ux-ui-design/design-that-converts#library-source-ux-ui-conversion-application. Accessed 2026-09-11. CC BY 4.0.

Version history: this catalogue documents the version shown above. No earlier change log is provided here.

Interpretation limit

An interface may make a decision easier; this dataset demonstrates no conversion uplift.

Register of 12 risks and four gates

Website redesign risk register

Twelve risks, RF01 to RF12, linked to signals, evidence, owners and four GO/NO-GO decision gates.

Decide whether a redesign stage can pass its next GO/NO-GO gate.

Version
1.0
Status
Published · no aggregate score
Published
Languages
FR · EN
Read the HTML source — Website redesign risk register
Preview & files 2 files

Inside the instrument

Three excerpts from the published file · abridged where necessary
IDRiskExpected evidence
RF01Refondre sans problème démontréDiagnostic daté reliant chaque problème à un utilisateur, un objectif métier, un signal mesurable ou une contrainte vérifiable.
RF02Commencer sans baseline exploitableDossier d’état initial horodaté : crawl, exports Search Console et analytics, parcours, formulaires, mesures terrain et captures de configuration utiles.
RF03Ne pas nommer le propriétaire de chaque décisionMatrice de responsabilités indiquant décideur, contributeurs, délai de réponse et règle d’escalade pour chaque famille de décision.

Read the original file — Website redesign risk register · v1.0 · original excerpt in French

Cite this version

Edikka (2026). Website redesign risk register (v1.0). https://www.edikka.com/en/insights/digital-strategy/website-redesign-costly-mistakes#library-source-website-redesign-risk-register. Accessed 2026-09-11. CC BY 4.0.

Version history: this catalogue documents the version shown above. No earlier change log is provided here.

Interpretation limit

A decision-documentation instrument with no budget, schedule, compliance, ranking or conversion guarantee.

Transparent calculation workbook

Website redesign budget estimator

A visible-formula workbook estimating initial budget, recurring costs and three-year total cost from editable assumptions.

Make budget assumptions explicit before requesting a quote.

Version
2026-08-20
Status
Published · open formulas
Published
Languages
FR · EN
Read the HTML source — Website redesign budget estimator
Preview & files 2 files

Inside the instrument

Three excerpts from the published file · abridged where necessary
ItemUnitInitial quantity
Diagnosis and framingfixed scope1
Information architecturefixed scope1
Editorial supportpage5

Read the original file — Website redesign budget estimator · v2026-08-20

Cite this version

Edikka (2026). Website redesign budget estimator (v2026-08-20). https://www.edikka.com/en/insights/digital-strategy/website-redesign-cost#library-source-website-redesign-budget-estimator. Accessed 2026-09-11. CC BY 4.0.

Version history: this catalogue documents the version shown above. No earlier change log is provided here.

Interpretation limit

An indicative estimator based on entered assumptions and Edikka pricing policy; it is not a quotation.

Editable framing template

B2B website redesign brief

A template connecting requirements, acceptance criteria, evidence, owners and blocking status before procurement or launch.

Write verifiable requirements before selecting a supplier.

Version
1.2
Status
Published · editable
Published
Languages
FR · EN
Read the HTML source — B2B website redesign brief
Preview & files 2 files

Inside the instrument

Three excerpts from the published file · abridged where necessary
To specifyTemplate prompt
Organisation and offers[Activities, markets, languages, regions, sales cycle, sector constraints]
Role of the current website[Lead generation, information, recruitment, support, portal, other]
Reasons for the redesign[Observed obstacles, debt, brand change, new needs, deadline]

Read the original file — B2B website redesign brief · v1.2

Cite this version

Edikka (2026). B2B website redesign brief (v1.2). https://www.edikka.com/en/insights/digital-strategy/b2b-website-redesign-brief#library-source-b2b-website-redesign-brief. Accessed 2026-09-11. CC BY 4.0.

Version history: this catalogue documents the version shown above. No earlier change log is provided here.

Interpretation limit

The template must be adapted to context, contract and risk level; it does not replace legal review.

GO/NO-GO acceptance workbook

Pre-launch website acceptance matrix

Fifty-four pre-launch checks, fifteen post-launch checks and three decision gates with evidence and owners.

Document acceptance testing and reservations before a launch decision.

Version
1.0
Status
Published · no global score
Published
Languages
FR · EN
Read the HTML source — Pre-launch website acceptance matrix
Preview & files 2 files

Inside the instrument

Three excerpts from the published file · abridged where necessary
IDCheckExpected evidence
PM-01Critical pages availableDated crawl, URL, HTTP status and final destination.
PM-02Primary navigationManual journey and link export.
PM-03Footer and cross-site linksLink crawl and human review.

Read the original file — Pre-launch website acceptance matrix · v1.0

Cite this version

Edikka (2026). Pre-launch website acceptance matrix (v1.0). https://www.edikka.com/en/insights/web-development/website-acceptance-testing-before-launch#library-source-website-acceptance-testing-matrix. Accessed 2026-09-11. CC BY 4.0.

Version history: this catalogue documents the version shown above. No earlier change log is provided here.

Interpretation limit

The matrix organises agreed acceptance; it does not guarantee defect-free delivery or future website outcomes.

04

Automate with controls

Contracts and evaluation sets for assisting production without delegating human validation.

Output JSON Schema Reference instrument

AI-assisted SEO recommendation contract

A machine contract requiring recommendation types, evidence, confidence, risks, application traceability and human validation.

Validate a recommendation’s structure before human review.

Version
2026-08-19
Status
Published · mandatory human validation
Published
Languages
FR · EN
Read the HTML source — AI-assisted SEO recommendation contract
Preview & files 1 file

Inside the instrument

Three excerpts from the published file · abridged where necessary
FieldTypeConstraint
typestring["brief", "title", "meta_description", "internal_link", "content_gap", "cannibalization_risk"]
confidencestring["low", "medium", "high"]
requires_human_validationboolean{"const": true}

Read the original file — AI-assisted SEO recommendation contract · v2026-08-19

Cite this version

Edikka (2026). AI-assisted SEO recommendation contract (v2026-08-19). https://www.edikka.com/en/insights/ai-web-automation/ai-seo-automation#library-source-ai-seo-recommendation-contract. Accessed 2026-09-11. CC BY 4.0.

Version history: this catalogue documents the version shown above. No earlier change log is provided here.

Interpretation limit

The schema validates structure, not recommendation truth; no “published” decision is allowed.

Twelve-case JSONL test set

Reliable AI evaluation set

Nominal, missing-data, ambiguity, contradictory-source, injection, secret, tool-failure and regression cases.

Test missing-data and ambiguous cases before delegating a task to AI.

Version
2026-08-19
Status
Published · 12 replayable cases
Published
Languages
FR · EN
Read the HTML source — Reliable AI evaluation set
Preview & files 2 files

Inside the instrument

Three excerpts from the published file · abridged where necessary · synthetic examples
IDFamilyExpected decision
EVAL-001nominalready_for_review
EVAL-002missing_required_dataclarify
EVAL-003ambiguityclarify

Read the original file — Reliable AI evaluation set · v2026-08-19

Cite this version

Edikka (2026). Reliable AI evaluation set (v2026-08-19). https://www.edikka.com/en/insights/ai-web-automation/reliable-ai-prompts-business-rules#library-source-reliable-ai-evaluation-set. Accessed 2026-09-11. CC BY 4.0.

Version history: this catalogue documents the version shown above. No earlier change log is provided here.

Interpretation limit

A starting point to adapt to a specific task and risk; the set certifies no model or system.

Bilingual governance workbook

AI-assisted FAQ matrix

Twelve synthetic B2B questions with sources, priority, answer contract, owners, statuses and acceptance tests.

Connect every FAQ answer to a source and human approval.

Version
2026-08-19
Status
Published · synthetic data
Published
Languages
FR · EN
Read the HTML source — AI-assisted FAQ matrix
Preview & files 1 file

Inside the instrument

Three excerpts from the published file · abridged where necessary · synthetic examples
IDAnonymised questionExample status
FAQ-001Quel est le délai de déploiement multi-sites ?To validate / À valider
FAQ-002La solution est-elle compatible avec Microsoft Entra ID ?Approved / Approuvé
FAQ-003Quel est le budget minimal ?To validate / À valider

Read the original file — AI-assisted FAQ matrix · v2026-08-19 · original excerpt in French

Cite this version

Edikka (2026). AI-assisted FAQ matrix (v2026-08-19). https://www.edikka.com/en/insights/ai-web-automation/ai-assisted-faq-customer-questions#library-source-ai-assisted-faq-matrix. Accessed 2026-09-11. CC BY 4.0.

Version history: this catalogue documents the version shown above. No earlier change log is provided here.

Interpretation limit

A synthetic case with no demonstrated traffic, conversion, support-deflection or AI-citation gain.

Reuse

Cite the instrument, not just the file.

Keep the title, version, publication date, publisher and source URL. When a DOI exists, use it as the permanent identifier.

Suggested citation for this catalogue

Edikka (2026). Edikka Open Instrument Library, edition 1.0.1. https://www.edikka.com/en/library

Edikka — instrument title, version, source URL and access date. CC BY 4.0.

Catalogue governance

Additions are frozen; maintenance continues.

Additions frozen since 8 September 2026: the catalogue remains limited to the 21 instruments in edition 1.0.0.

Maintenance, corrections and new versions of existing instruments continue. Priority is given to external review and reuse before any additions resume.

Editorial direction and maintenance : Bertrand Morel · ORCID · Contact

Help improve this edition.

An error, a missing source or a reuse to share? Your email draft includes the edition. Add the instrument, your evidence and the context; do not include confidential client data.

Report an error by email Share a reuse by email

No email app configured? Use the contact form.

External review is invited, not claimed as completed. A reported issue must be checked before a correction is published.

Catalogue version history
  1. 1.0.1 · 2026-09-11

    Resource identities aligned, source membership added, previews and citations made accessible, vocabulary documented and feedback channels added. The collection remains at 21 instruments; the instrument files are unchanged.

  2. 1.0.0 · 2026-09-08

    First edition: 21 instruments, bilingual catalogue, archive and checksums. The NLM catalogue reference was clarified on 9 September.

    Download the previous archive

For search engines and agents

The entire library. One file.

One versioned bilingual archive contains all 82 catalogued files and their verification dependencies, both JSON and Markdown catalogues, citation metadata, the licence, a manifest and verifiable SHA-256 checksums.

ZIP Download the complete archive — Edikka Open Instrument Library 82 catalogued files · proof dependencies · FR/EN catalogues · SHA-256 manifest · 941 KB

Catalogue edition 1.0.1 ·

Verify the downloaded files

Extract the ZIP, open a terminal in its root folder and run the command for your system. Every listed file must return OK. This checks file integrity, not the validity of its conclusions.

Linux

sha256sum -c SHA256SUMS

macOS

shasum -a 256 -c SHA256SUMS

From evidence to decision

Need to apply one of these instruments to a real project?

Edikka can frame the perimeter, conduct the review and turn the findings into a prioritised decision.

Discuss the project